This is an argument for the ontological primacy of verbs instead of nouns.
I just want to point out that we have no reason (except for the real-world experience of things bumping into each other that we recently discovered wasn’t actually happening) to believe that there needs to be a “thing” in order for “it” to do an action. We have no reason to believe that verbs require nouns; that acts require actors. Everything we’ve observed in physics has been verbs, no nouns yet discovered. ANYWHERE. EVER. Why should we believe that “things” exist at all, when all we’ve ever observed has been the existence of “actions”?
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: argument, electron, fields, hegel, language, light, logic, magnetic fields, ontological, ontology, particles, photon, physics, proof, string theory, wave-particle duality, wave/particle duality, waves | Leave a Comment »